Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190181 (ALL)

MANJU DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9989/2025 · 2025-10-17

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9989 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Saurabh Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A for the State. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main relief(s):- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party no. 2 & 3 to take all legal and necessary actions according to law against the accused persons in pursuance of first information report, registered as F.I.R./Case Crime No. 383 of 2025 under Section 3(2)(Va), 3(1)(Gha), 3(1)(Da) SC/ST Act and sections 351(2), 352, 115(2) BNS (506, 504, 323 IPC), Police Station- Dewa, District- Barabanki, as well as in the light of medical evidence of the son of the petitioner, which shows that there is grievous injury on the vital part of the body and the matter should be investigated in the light of section 109 BNS (307 IPC) also, against the accused persons as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this Writ Petition, and to secure the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from the clutches of the accused persons." 3. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions dated 10.10.2025 received from Sri Sangam Kumar, Circle Officer, Barabanki, submits that the charge sheet No. 376/2025 dated 03.08.2025 has been forwarded to the Supervisory Authority, who after examining the same shall forward Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Seema Upadhyay, Saurabh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Manju Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) accordingly. The said instructions are taken on record. Thus, he submits that this petition has rendered infructuous. 4. In view of the above, this present writ petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, if so required and advised. October 17, 2025 Preeti CRLP No. 9989 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench