HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11176 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed only for a direction for petitioner's representation to be considered. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had to approach this Court in view of the fact that marks obtained by him under the normalization process for recruitment on the post of Assistant Radio Operator is not being provided to him due to which he had filed an application under the Right to Information Act, which has also drawn unaided. 3. However, neither any specific prayer has been made in this petition nor any such application under the Right to Information Act has been filed by petitioner through substantiate his submissions. 4. In view thereof, the petition is dismissed granting liberty to petitioner to file a fresh with the current pleadings, prayer and relevant documents appended. September 22, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kavita Mishra, Mohd. Raziullah, Shahid Salam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Aman Dhama .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench