SHAMIM @ SHAMIM AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/9448/2025 · 2025-10-07
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190160 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190160 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9448 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.35 of 2025 under section 80(2), 85 BNS and section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Ranipur, District Bahraich. 3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant and there was a demand for Bullet Motorcycle and on 10.02.2025 at about 12:00, the daughter of the informant was beaten to death. It was also stated that she was administered poison. The postmortem report on record does not indicate any injury on the body of the deceased. The FSL Report on record indicates the presence of Chlorpyrifos insecticide in the viscera. It is further argued that the co-accused who were the mother in law and father in law of the victim have been enlarged on bail vide orders which are on record. The applicant is the husband. 4. Considering the submissions, prima-facie, the postmortem report does not corroborate the allegation of beating up as stated in the FIR, there is no material to demonstrate that the poison was administered at the instance of the applicant and there are no material to suggest that soon before the death, the victim was subjected to any physical or mental harassment, which resulted in the death, the applicant who is in custody since 02.07.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Raman Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shamim @ Shamim Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
allowed. 5.
Let the applicant Shamim @ Shamim Ahmad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 7, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 9448 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench