Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19016 (JHR)

KAUSHIK GIRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7225/2025 · 2025-09-19

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:28983 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7225 of 2025 ------ Kaushik Giri, son of Fanibhushan Giri, resident of at Dakshin Mahendrapur, PO and PS Pathorpartima, District South 24 Parganas, West Bengal … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjan Prasad Ram, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, A.P.P. ----- 08/ 19.09.2025 Heard the parties. 2. In this application the petitioner is praying for grant of regular bail in connection with Godda (Town) PS Case no. 10 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. No. 26 of 2016 registered under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. This is a case where the petitioner by floating a company, has cheated several persons. The trial is in progress. The prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected twice. 5. Out of 14 chargesheeted witnesses, 6 have been examined in this case. The trial Court has sent a report that within six months trial can be concluded. 6. Considering the nature of the case since the trial has 2025:JHHC:28983 2 proceeded, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. 7. The trial Court should try to conclude the trial as early as possible by fixing a schedule to record the statement of the witnesses. The schedule so prepared should be handed over to the investigating officer so that examination of the remaining witnesses can be concluded within the scheduled time. 8. This bail application is dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3