HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5983 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Ms. Meenu, Advocate holding brief of Sri Nishant Srivastava, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 2. By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gonda to decide their application under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. filed in Regular Suit No.2106 of 2022. 3. A copy of order sheet of the trial court has been annexed with the petition which reveals that the trial court had passed an order dated 01.09.2022 recording that an application for temporary injunction was pressed on the aforesaid date upon with the learned counsel for the defendant stated that he has no objection in case a time bound temporary injunction order is passed in favour of the applicants and thereupon the learned trial court has passed an order for maintaining status-quo between the parties in respect of the property in dispute. The aforesaid order is being continuously extended on each dates fixed in the suit. Therefore, the grievance raised by filing this petition that the petitioner's application for temporary injunction is not being decided and that the petitioner is being prejudiced by non-grant of temporary injunction order in his Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nishant Srivastava, Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Mohd. Zeeshan Khan And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Gonda And Another .....Respondent(s) favour is absolutely misconceived. 4. The petition lacks merit and the same is accordingly dismissed . October 7, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 5983 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench