HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6229 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of the petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of a revision under Section 48(1) of the U.P.C.H Act, 1953 which is engaging attention of the D.D.C Barabanki. Considering the aforesaid submissions as well as from a perusal of the record, extracts of order sheet, which have been brought on record as Annexure-2, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition, at this stage. However, leaving it open for the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the D.D.C concerned and in case, if such an application moved, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. It is further clarified that in case, if any cause for expedition arises in future the instant order may not come in the way of the petitioner. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Abhishek Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Jaskaran .....Petitioner(s) The Court Of Deputy Director Consolidation, Barabanki And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench