HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11456 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.99 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 308, 324 & 504 IPC (now under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504, 325, 120-B IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act), P.S. Ram Janam Bhumi, District Ayodhya. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the co-accused with similar allegation has been enlarged on bail. Adopting the same and the fact that the applicant has explained the criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 5. Considering the said fact and that the applicant is in custody since 8.10.2025, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant, Shree Ram Das, be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 Anupam Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Tiwari, Smt. Usha Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Shree Ram Das .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench