HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11615 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Gyan Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 were initiated by the petitioner by filing appropriate application before the Tehsildar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar which was dismissed on 26.10.2023, in absence of petitioner. 3. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an application for recall on the same day and same has not been registered and accordingly, present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to register and decide the application of the petitioner expeditiously. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received from the Tehsildar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar has informed this Court that recall application has already been registered as Case No. T 202504040414421 - Radhika Devi Vs. Rakesh and Others, where next date fixed is 17.12.2025. The instructions are taken on record. 5. It is though, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, but this court is surprised by the fact that the Tehsildar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar did not register the application of the petitioner for nearly two years and it is only after the present writ petition has been Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyan Singh Chauhan, Amitabh Singh Raikwar, Archana Kamal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Radhika Devi .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Allapur, Ambedkar Nagar And Another .....Respondent(s) filed, the said application has been registered which is evident from the case number itself. 6. Accordingly, considering the fact that grievance of petitioner stands redressed, no further directions are required to be passed in the present matter. 7. It is expected that the Tehsildar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar shall proceed to consider and decide Case No. T 202504040414421 - Radhika Devi Vs. Rakesh and Others, expeditiously, in accordance with law. 8. It is a matter of serious concern that the applications filed by the aggrieved persons/petitioners are not registered or registered after such delay of two years, which is certainly not acceptable. 9. Accordingly, the District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to conduct inquiry in the matter to determine the reasons as to why application for recall was registered after lapse of two years and he should take action against concerned officers/officials who are responsible for such delay. 10. In the light of aforesaid, present writ petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 A. Verma WRIC No. 11615 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench