MOHAMMAD ABID v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/12548/2025 · 2025-10-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190109 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190109 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12548 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Alok Singh, learned counsel for the State, Sri Aditya Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :-
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no. 3 to decide the representation dated 20.08.2025 made to opposite party no.3 to grant the benefit of A.C.P as given to similarly situated persons in the light of circular dated 20.06.2025 issued by opposite party no. 2 i.e. Managing Director Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (Contained as Annexure No.1) preferred by the petitioner and if any dues is found admissible then the same shall be paid to the petitioner in the time bound manner." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation on 20- 08-2025 before the opposite party no. 3/Regional Manager Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Prayagraj Region,Prayagraj and the same is pending consideration. He further submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Narayan Shukla, Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra Mohammad Abid .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, the opposite party no. 3/Regional Manager Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Prayagraj Region,Prayagraj, is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20- 08-2025 within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. Needless to say that if the authorities find that there are some dues payable to the petitioner, the same shall be paid to him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
October 17, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12548 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench