Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19010 (PNJ)

MINTU v. HIMMAT SINGH AND OTHERS

COCP/504/2025 · 2025-02-10

Harkesh Manuja

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP No.504 of 2025 IN TH 199 MINTU Vs HIMMAT SINGH CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. S Mr. Mr. V Mr. A HARKESH MAN 1. Lear from the office o that name of the p Clerk with the Da 2. Lear from Sh. Pawan K terms of the reco join within three w 3. In vi counsel for the pe 4. Dism 5. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a February 10, 20 Atik Wheth Wheth 025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De SINGH AND OTHERS ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate for the pe Mr. Amit Aggarwal, D.A.G., Haryan Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate with Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for respon **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel relies upon a ffice of the Secretary, Haryana Staff f the petitioner has been recommende the Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Niga Learned counsel representing respo awan Kumar, Under Secretary HR-II, e recommendation made by the HSSC three weeks from today upon completi In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the presen Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.504 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 10.02.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondents ESH MANUJA the petitioner. aryana for respondent Nos.1 and 2. respondent Nos.3 and 4. a communication dated 10.02.202 Staff Selection Commission to subm mended for the post of Lower Divisio n Nigam Limited. respondent Nos.3 & 4 on instruction II, DHBVNL, Hisar submits that HSSC, the petitioner shall be made mpletion of necessary formalities. ertaking by the respondent(s), learne present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 02.2025 submit ivision ructions s that in made to learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.11 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment