Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19010 (GAU)

VARTAK LABOUR UNION v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3097/2024 · 2025-03-11

Kaushik Goswami

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010203612024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3097/2024 VARTAK LABOUR UNION REGD. UNDER THE TRADE UNION ACT WITH REGD. OFFICE AT TEZPUR, P.O. TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, AND REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-11 2:THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS TRANSPORT BHAWAN SANSAD MARG NEW DELHI-110001 3:THE BORDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT BOARD THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS 4TH FLOOR B WING SENA BHAWAN NEW DELHI-110105 4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER VARTAK DIVISION TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM C/O 99 APO 5:THE COMMANDANT Page No.# 2/3 EASTERN BASE WORKSHOP DIVISION TEZPUR C/O 99 APO 6:COMMANDANT ASSTT. GARRISON ENGINEERING DIVISION TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM C/O 99 APO 7:OFFICER COMMANDING THE EASTERN STORES DIVISION TEZPUR SONITPUR ASSAM C/O 99 AP For the applicant : Ms. T. Wapangla, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, D.S.G.I. – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI 12-03-2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, C.J.) The matter comes up for consideration of IA(Civil) No.3097/2024 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with the prayer for condonation of delay of 52 days in filing the connected writ appeal. Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India puts in appearance on behalf of all the respondents and submits that he does not have any objection if the delay is condoned. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and after going through the contents of this application, we deem it appropriate to allow the prayer for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the delay of 52 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. Page No.# 3/3 The interlocutory application is disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same after three weeks for admission. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant