Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1901 (CHH)

Narendra Kumar Chandrakar v. Kaluram Jain (Died) Through His Legal Heir

FA/322/2016 · 2025-07-17

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Smt Rajani Dubey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:33964-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 322 of 2016 Narendra Kumar Chandrakar S/o Kedarnath Chandrakar, aged about 55 years, R/o Shivaji Nagar Kohka, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh .................Defendant No.1 ... Appellant Versus 1 - Kaluram Jain (Died) Through his Legal Heirs as per The Hon'ble Court Order Dated 12- 11-2021. (a) Mahavir Jain (Lodha) S/o Late Kaluram Jain, R/o Mahabir Colony, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (b) Santosh Jain (Lodha) S/o Late Kaluram Jain R/o Mahabir Colony, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - Dinesh Jain S/o Parasmal Jain, aged about 46 years R/o Mahabir Colony Durg, Tehsil Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh .................Plaintiff No.2. 3 - The State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh .................Defendant No.2. ... Respondents For Appellant : None. For Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. Karunendra Narayan Singh, on behalf of Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate. For State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, P.L. Digitally signed by RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU 2 Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey J. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J. Order on Board Per, Rajani Dubey , Judge 18.07.2025 1. Despite repeated calls, none appears for the appellant, nor there is any representation made on his behalf. 2. The appeal is of the year 2016, it appears that with the efflux of time, the appellant has lost the interest in contesting the appeal. 3. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. It is dismissed as such. 4. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE JUDGE U. K. Raju