IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.12118 of 2025 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 11th August, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.12118 of 2025 Tilak Raj …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.12122 of 2025 Jagdish Chand …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CWP No.12124 of 2025 Rakesh Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CWP No.12126 of 2025 Pawan Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. CWP No.12128 of 2025 Sunil Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have preferred representations (Annexure P-4 in all the petitions) to the respondents for the redressal of their grievances raised in these writ petitions. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to decide the aforesaid representations within a fixed time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 3 petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 11, 2025 Judge Mukesh