HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1919 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Aditya Mishra, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.426 of 2025, under Sections 69, 352, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Gudamba, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the informant was in contact with the applicant through Instagarm for the last three years wherein he had projected himself as Rahul and slowly they came close and thereafter on false pretext of marriage from last three years physical relation were formed. Subsequently when the victim asked him to marry the applicant refused. It was further stated that the applicant had relationship with other females also. It was also stated that thereafter victim blocked him on the social site. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the victim is about 24 years and physical relation lasted for a span of three years and FIR in question has been lodged without even disclosing as to which act of the applicant would amount to false promise of marriage. 4. Learned counsel for the informant on the other hand states that initially the applicant had approached her by disclosing his name as Rahul Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohemmed Amir Naqvi, Abhishek Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Mohsin @ Mohsin Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) whereas his actual name is Mohsin Khan, which is a deception. 5. Whatsapp chat has been forwarded across the bar which disclose that the applicant and the victim were chatting under the name of Khan Sahab. Thus the FIR version prima facie appears to be incorrect, however the same is subject to investigation. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances, prima facie, case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Mohd. Mohsin @ Mohsin Khan be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. December 8, 2025 J. K. Dinkar NABAIL No. 1919 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench