IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:rAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13169 OF 2025 Between: Settipally Raveena Premavathi, W/o. S. Chandra Sekhara, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Housewife, Resident of D.No.16-621-B-2, Seshappa Thota, Gandhi Road, Madanapalli, Annamayya District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA), APIIC Towers, 3rd floor, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Tirupathi District, Tirupathi. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not passing any orders on the Appeal dated 06-01-2025 filed by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders forthwith on the appeal dated 06-01-2025 filed by the petitioner in respect of land situate in Sy.No.200/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.6.18 cents in Damineedu Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Tirupathi District lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders forthwith appeal dated 06-01-2025 filed by the petitioner, pending disposal of on the the Writ Petition before this Hon’ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SAMBANGI MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following; Order APHC010262982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13169/2025 Between; ...PETITIONER Settipally Raveena Premavathi, AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SAMBANGI MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13169/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- ‘to pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one In the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2^'^ respondent in not passing any orders on the Appeal dated 06.01.2025 filed by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegai and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2^^ respondent to pass appropriate orders forthwith on the appeal dated 06.01.2025 filed by the petitioner in respect of land situate In Sy.No. 200/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.6.18 cents In Damineedu Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, TirupathI District and pass.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the requested this Court, without touching the merits of the a direction to the respondents to dispose of the dated 06.01.2025 preferred by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the appeal, if any pending with the respondents. petitioner case, to issue appeal 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court the is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the The Government of India v. judgnnent of the Apex Court in wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the appeal, this Court find no other P.Venkatesh alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the appeal dated 06.01.2025 preferred by the petitioner before the 2""' respondent, after providing opportunitvt of .hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGI^RAR '2019 (8) SCALE 544 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1 The Special Chief Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District, 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA), APIIC Towers, ^, 3rd floor, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Tirupathi District, Tirupathi. SAMBANGl MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Advocate [OPUC] FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. One CC to SRI 5. TwoCCstoGP 6. Three CD Copies gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 09/05/2025 o^OrANDf^. ORDER C) ? 5 jfII m 3:: o\- c> m 3- ^ Currem Seciion . •#’ WP.No.13169of 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS