INDER YADAV AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER
/3577/2025 · 2025-11-04
Manjive Shukla
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190066 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190066 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3577 of 2025 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State.
2. The captioned criminal appeal has been filed challenging therein, the summoning order dated 15.07.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Lucknow in Session Case No.2037 of 2023 and Charge-sheet dated 25.02.2023 filed in Case Crime No.0028 of 2023, whereby the appellant had been summoned to face trial for the offences punishable under Sections 147,323, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(VA), SC/ST Act, Police Station-B.B.D., District- Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants, at the very outset, has submitted that the appellants shall surrender before the trial court and shall file the application for grant of bail. He has further submitted that this Court may direct the trial court to consider and decide the appellants' application for bail in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State does not have any objection if the aforesaid limited prayer is allowed in favour of the appellants.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this criminal appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellants to surrender before the trial court concerned and file the application for bail within a period of four weeks from today and Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Shamsher Ali, Udai Vir Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Inder Yadav And 3 Others .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Respondent(s)
if such application is filed, the trial court is hereby directed to consider and decide the said application, expeditiously keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). It is further provided that for the period of four weeks, no coercive measures shall be taken against the appellants. November 4, 2025 Satish CRLA No. 3577 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench