MOHD. HAIDER RIZVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9054/2025 · 2025-10-17
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190052 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190052 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9054 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
"For the facts, reasons and circumstances mentioned in the accompanying affidavit; it is most respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash non-bailable warrant issued vide impugned order dated 18-10-2023 passed by Ld. Court of Special Judge, Gangsters Act/Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Lucknow in Session Trial No. 61/2016; State Vs. Mohd. Haider & Ors. arises out of FIR bearing Case Crime No. 132/2015 (FIR No. 0124/2015) Us. 3(1) of the U. P. Gangsters Act, 1986 Ps. Thakurganj, Lucknow in the interest of justice." Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Inder Mohan Goswami and another vs. State of Uttranchal and others reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1, Sunil Tyagi vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3597 and Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and the statement of counsel for the applicant that the applicant would appear before the court concerned, it is provided that if the applicant appears before the court concerned within two weeks from today and move an appropriate application before the trial court including for recall of non-bailable warrant, the same shall be considered and decided by the trial court expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. For a period of two weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant so far as the proceedings in issue are concerned. In case, the applicant does not appear in terms of this order, coercive action shall be taken against him. The present application is disposed of in above terms. October 17, 2025/Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Haider Rizvi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench