LAXMI PRASAD NIRANJAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. RURAL DEV. DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/14102/2025 · 2025-12-08
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190044 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190044 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14102 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Head learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief:-
"1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.1 to grant the benefit of 2nd A.C.P. to the petitioners w.e.f. 1-1-2014 w.e.f the date his juniors have been granted the same, in place of 7-4-2016, and pay arrears of salary w.e.f 1-1-2014 till the date of retirement."
3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.1 i.e. State of U.P. through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development Department, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 8, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Laxmi Prasad Niranjan And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Rural Dev. Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench