SHYAM LAL v. U.P. JAL NIGAM THRU M.D. LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
WRIA/12044/2017 · 2025-11-21
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190023 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190023 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12044 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 21, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : I.P. Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Shyam Lal .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam Thru M.D. Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench