Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190022 (ALL)

ABHAY TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO AND OTHERS

/11586/2025 · 2025-12-09

Abdul Moin, Rajeev Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11586 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Shailesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.4 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0493 of 2025, under Sections 351(3), 352, 318 (4), 319(2), 316(4) of B.N.S., Police Station- Kotwali Dehat, District Bahraich. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR carry maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest them, which is against the mandate of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. 4. Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondents-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another - (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another- (2022) 10 SCC 51. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farhan Shaikh, Iqbal Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Krishna Kumar Shukla, Shailesh Kumar Shukla Abhay Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that his petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. However, it is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station whenever they are required to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, they shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. December 9, 2025 Shukla CRLP No. 11586 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench