Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010202852025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2225/2025 SRI AMINUR RAHMAN MONDAL AND 4 ORS. S/O LATE ABDUL MANNAN MONDAL, RESIDENT OF VILL. PADMABIL, P.O. GOSSAIGAON, P.S. GOSSAIGAON, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, BTR, ASSAM PIN 783360 2: SMTI BEAUTY KHATUN W/O AMINUR RAHMAN MONDAL RESIDENT OF VILL. PADMABIL P.O. GOSSAIGAON P.S. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM PIN 783360 3: SMTI MASUMA BIBI W/O LATE ABDUL MANNAN MONDAL RESIDENT OF VILL. PADMABIL P.O. GOSSAIGAON P.S. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM PIN 783360 4: SRI AMINUL HOQUE S/O LATE ABDUL MAZID SHEIKH RESIDENT OF VILL. 1 NO. BHOMRBIL P.O. GOLADANGI P.S. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM PIN 783361 5: SMTI ZINDA BEGUM ALIAS ZINATA BEGUM ALIAS BELI KHATUN W/O AMINUL HOQUE RESIDENT OF VILL. 1 NO. BHOMRBIL Page No.# 2/3 P.O. GOLADANGI P.S. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM PIN 78336 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP,ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A A R KARIM, MD S A MONDAL,MR. A DEB,Ms. R. R. BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 09.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. A. A. R. Karim, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioners as well as Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. 2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed by the petitioners, namely, (1) Aminur Rahman Mondal (2) Smti. Beauty Khatun (3) Smti. Masuma Bibi (4) Aminul Hoque and (5) Smti Zinda Begum @ Zinata Begum @ Beli Khatun, apprehending arrest in connection with Gossaigaon P.S. Case No.89/2025 under Sections 103/3(5) of BNS corresponding to GR No. 97/2025. 3. The case arose out of an FIR dated 01.07.2025 lodged by the father of the deceased who was stated to be married with the present accused. Their allegation Page No.# 3/3 is that she faced various torture and cruelty and on 08.06.2025 when the informant went to her matrimonial home the accused persons named in the FIR has assaulted her causing injuries and also fed her poison forcefully. That, despite treatment over the next few days, she is stated to have expired on 28.06.2025. It is stated that she left behind one dying declaration. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petitioners are the family members of the husband of the deceased and have been falsely implicated. 5. However, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the deceased has implicated the family members in her supposed dying declaration. 6. I have perused the relevant portion of the case diary and the said dying declaration which was sent for forensic examination and prima facie returned a finding of handwriting match with the sample in writing. 7. Despite the progress of investigation and length of detention and considering the serious nature of allegation, I am of the considered view that investigation should be allowed to be completed. 8. Accordingly, the bail petition stands rejected at this stage. 9. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant