APHC010263182012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 880/2012 Between: Maraka Rama Krishna & Another and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of A P ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.880 of 2012 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2024 In/& Crl.R.C.No.880 of 2012 ORDER: I.A.No.1 of 2024 is filed to implead the complainant/PW.1 Smt. Madata Sridevei Alias Udata Sridevi wife of the 1st petitioner herein as respondent No.2 in this revision. 2. In the affidavit, the petitioner narrated that on a complaint given by her, the revision petitioners were convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of one year and also to pay fine of Rs.4,000/- (Rupees Four Thousand Only) and Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) respectively for the offence under Section 324 I.P.C. Aggrieved thereby, they filed an appeal i.e. Crl.Appeal No.308 of 2011. The said Appeal was allowed in part confirming the conviction and sentence against A.1/ 1st petitioner and acquitting the A.2/2nd petitioner. Instead of filing revision by the 1st petitioner, mistakenly, both the petitioners filed revision before this Court. It is also mentioned in the affidavit that their children have became majors now and with the intervention of the children, elders and well wishers, they have compromised the case and are living with children amicably at Dokitarthi Village. Hence, the applications were filed for recording compromise. 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.880 of 2012 3. The parties are present and being identified by their respective learned counsels. The parties have filed photo copies of their Aadhar cards in support of their identity. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, the Compromise is recorded, which is accordingly made part of this case. 5. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, I.A.No.1 of 2024 is allowed impleading the petitioner as 2nd respondent in this revision. 6. I.A.Nos.2 and 3 and 2024 are allowed compounding and compromising the offence, as a result, the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Guntur in Crl.A.No.308 of 2011 is set aside and the revision petitioner No.1 alone is acquitted for the offence under Section 324 of I.P.C. The terms of the compromise shall be made part of the revision. 7. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Petition disposed of in terms of the compromise and petitioner No.1 is acquitted. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 03.02.2025 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.880 of 2012 116 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 880/2012 03.02.2024 KMS