HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10260 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Dinesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, who at the very outset, submits that he does not wish to press his first relief. Hence, he is required to delete the first prayer and make necessary endorsement. 2. Since, the learned counsel for the petitioner has not pressed his first relief and he only confines his second prayer that is to say that the petitioner had moved an application before the Additional Commissioner for recall of an ex-parte order dated 12.09.2025, the same may be decided expeditiously. 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed notice to the private- respondents No.2 and 3 is dispensed with. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances and from a perusal of the material on record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide the pending recall application of an ex-parte order dated 12.09.2025 most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 5. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharad Kumar Verma, Dinesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Bilas .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the aforesaid application for recall of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Rakesh/- WRIC No. 10260 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench