ANEESH KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/5687/2024 · 2025-09-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189997 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5687 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:-
"(i). issue writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 28.05.2024, passed by the Opposite Party Number 2, as contained in Annexure Number 1 to this writ petition. (ii). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing and commanding the Opposite Party Number 2 to forthwith grant the minimum of the pay- scale of Rs. 18,000/-as per 7th Pay Commission, along with arrears since March 2018 to the petitioner on Class IV Post, in terms of the judgment dated 17.11.2018, rendered by the Hon'ble High Court at Allahabad in Writ A Number 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and Another v State of U.P. and Others)."
3. It is submitted that the primary dispute agitated in the petition work for grant of minimum of the pay scale to petitioner which during pendency of petition has already been granted.
4. In view thereof, nothing remains to be adjudicated upon in the writ petition, which is accordingly consigned to record without any adverse effect upon benefits already granted to petitioner. September 19, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Aneesh Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench