Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189996 (ALL)

BALGAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOREST DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/13583/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13583 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's case for regularization on the post of Gardner in terms of Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Persons Working on Daily Wages or On Work Charge or On Contract in Government Departments on Group "C" and Group "D" Posts (Outside the Purview of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission) Rules, 2016 since petitioner has been engaged in service prior to cut off date. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Divisional Director of Social, Forestry Division, Sitapur - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 24, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Chandra Chauhan, Kashi Ram Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Balgar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench