RAVINDRA VIKRAM SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9575/2025 · 2025-11-18
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189974 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189974 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9575 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Sri Kunwar Samitinjay Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"Wherefore it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the charge sheet dated 22.01.2022 (Annexure No.1) arising out of Case Crime No. 0064/2021 under sections 323, 504, 506,498-A I.P.C and Section ¼ D.P. Act, registered at Police Station- Krishna Nagar District-Lucknow ( State vs Ravindra Vikram Singh and others) and further be pleased to direct the court below to decide the case in terms of compromise in accordance with law in the interest of justice. It is further prayed that further proceedings of this case (State vs Ravindra Vikram Singh and others) pending before Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VII, Lucknow may kindly be stayed during pendency of this petition."
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.3 to the application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dr. Ajai Pratap Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravindra Vikram Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7.
The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 18, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 9575 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench