HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 23100 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted withdraw the prayer clause (i) of the writ petition. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection. The prayer is allowed. The counsel for the petitioner is permitted to delete the prayer clause (i) during course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Arun Pratap Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to decide the pending representation of the petitioner for the redressal of his grievance for promotion to the Post of Lecturer Sanskrit subject in the college as contained in annexure no 4 to 7 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue any other writ order or directions which this Hon'ble court may deem fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case be also awarded to the petitioner against the opposite parties. (iii) To award the cost of this petition to the petitioner." It is contended by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh, Ankuj Kumar, Anuj Mishra, Bhuvan Dwivedi, Laxmi Kant Pathak, Soumya Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi, Ratnesh Dwivedi Siya Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education And Ors. .....Respondent(s) present matter is regarding the promotion of the petitioner that has not been done yet. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation claiming the interest on the delayed payment of gratuity and the respondent no. 4 may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 4/District Inspector of Schools, Unnao after calling the record from the committee of Management, shall consider and decide the same, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 23100 of 2021 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench