VIPIN KUMAR SHUKL @ VIPIN KUMAR SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DISTT. KHERI AND ANOTHER
A482/9274/2025 · 2025-11-04
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9274 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on account of some typographical error in this application he wants to withdraw this application with liberty to file fresh.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
3. Registry is directed to return the original/certified copies of the enclosures/documents to the learned counsel for the applicant after taking photocopies of the same. November 4, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanat Singh, Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) Vipin Kumar Shukl @ Vipin Kumar Shukla And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Distt. Kheri And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench