SATISH KUMAR SINGH @ SATISH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TAHSIL PATTI, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
A227/6476/2025 · 2025-11-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189952 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189952 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6476 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh to decide application filed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 titled as "Satish Kumar Singh and others Vs. Amit Singh and others", expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh is
directed to decide application filed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 titled as "Satish Kumar Singh and others Vs. Amit Singh and others", expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this
order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh, Mamta Tiwari, Vishwa Mohan Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Satish Kumar Singh @ Satish Kumar And Others .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Patti, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench