M/S.JEEVE CONSTRUCTIONS v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (NATIONAL HIGHWAYS)
WP/49298/2025 · 2025-12-16
N Sathish Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189947 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189947 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP.No.49298 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR WP.No.49298 of 2025 M/s.Jeeve Constructions Rep. By its Managing Partner A.Anbazhagan No.1/126, Jeeva Nagar Nagakudaiyan – 614 808 Vedaranyam Taluk Nagappattinam District .. Petitioner Versus
1. The Superintending Engineer National Highways Madurai Circle Madurai-2
2. The Divisional Engineer National Highways Trichy, Trichy District .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus Directing the 2nd respondent to issue the Worksite Inspection and Plant and Machineries Certificates to the petitioner relating to Tender Notice No.11/2025-26/HDO /NH/Date:01/12/2025 by considering the representation dated
12.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kamadevan For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh 1 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP.No.49298 of 2025 Government Advocate for R1 & R2 ORDER The petitioner seeks a direction to the second respondent to issue Worksite Inspection and Plant and Machineries Certificates to the petitioner by considering the representation dated 12.12.2025.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner visited the worksite after prior intimation to the second respondent but no worksite inspection and Plant and Machinery Working Condition certificates have been issued. It is further submitted that the petitioner went to the office of the second respondent on 09.12.2025 and 10.12.2025 seeking the above certificates, but the second respondent has not accepted the representation and hence, the petitioner sent the representation by post on 12.12.2025, but till date no action has been taken by the second respondent. Hence, the present writ petition.
3. Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Government Advocate, who accepted notice on behalf of the respondents submits, on instructions, that the petitioner submitted the application with a delay and hence, the application of the petitioner was rejected. 2 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP.No.49298 of 2025
4. This Court is of the view that these disputed question of facts cannot be gone into in a writ petition and hence, recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, this writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 16.12.2025 Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No gpa To
1. The Superintending Engineer National Highways Madurai Circle Madurai-2
2. The Divisional Engineer National Highways Trichy, Trichy District 3 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP.No.49298 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR
, J.
gpa W.P.No.49298 of 2025 16.12.2025 4 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis