RAM TIRATHY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/1004044/2006 · 2025-11-24
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1004044 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. List has been revised. None for the petitioners.
2. Sri Divesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel is present.
3. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, is vacated. November 24, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Chandra, Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., R.N.Gupta (Irshad Ali,J.) Ram Tirathy And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Through Secretary Revenue And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench