HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11352 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the deceased's father owned property, which is provided at page-17 and 18 of the writ petition. He further submits that the deceased, who is the husband of the petitioner, used to work in the farm of his father and was the sole breadwinner of the family. He also submits that the order rejecting her claim under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna is based on the ground that the deceased was not a landowner. He further submits that the authorities have not considered the claim of the petitioner that the deceased was a worker in the fields of his father, in spite of evidence being provided by the petitioner. 3. In light of the same, the impugned order is quashed and set aside with a direction upon the respondent authority to reconsider the matter of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 9, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganga Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt. Gudiya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench