Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189930 (ALL)

RAJESH CHANDER RATHORE @ KHANNA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9592/2025 · 2025-10-17

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9592 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Tripathi and Shri Mahesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsels appearing for the petitioner, Shri S.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent(s) as well as Shri Deepak Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel, who has filed his 'vakalatnama' on behalf of the complainant/opposite party no.4, which is taken on record and perused the material available on record. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned F.I.R. dated 28.09.2025, bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.0490 of 2025, under Sections 69, 123 and 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station- P.G.I., District- Lucknow. 3. Learned A.G.A. has informed that he has received complete instructions in the matter. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this petition may be disposed of finally and liberty may be given to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court and the same may be disposed of with expedition. 5. He has further submitted that since on account of 'Diwali vacation' the petitioner would not immediately file his anticipatory bail application, therefore, sometime may be given to file anticipatory bail application. 6. Having considered the aforesaid innocuous request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, we hereby dispose of the petition finally giving liberty to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court within a period of three weeks from today taking all pleas which are available to him and if Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Anil Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rajesh Chander Rathore @ Khanna .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) such anticipatory bail application is filed, the same may be heard and disposed of with expedition without giving any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Praveen CRLP No. 9592 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench