Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189929 (ALL)

BHAGAWAT PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

CRLP/9884/2025 · 2025-10-17

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9884 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. On being confronted, after considering the fact as pleaded including that the instant petition has been filed in relation to the order dated 31.08.2024 passed by opposite party no.4/SDM, Tehsil-Lalganj, District-Pratapgarh, learned Counsel for the petitioner stated that he may be permitted to correct the prayer clause during the course of the day as in prayer no.(i) opposite party no.3 has inadvertently indicated in place of opposite party no.4. The aforesaid prayer has not been opposed. Accordingly, the learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the same, during the course of the day. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no.4 to ensure compliance of order dated 31.08.2024 by his subordinate officer i.e. opposite party no.4 passed in Case smooth running of drainage by removing obstacle from drainage of Village Idilpur, Husainpur, Tahsil Lalganj, Police Station Sangipur, District Pratapgarh at the earliest." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Bhagawat Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Considering the facts as stated, particularly the period elapsed from the date of order i.e. 31.08.2024, this petition is disposed of with direction to opposite party no.4, to do the needful in the matter, most expeditiously. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Jyoti/- CRLP No. 9884 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench