IKBAL @ IQBAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1555/2025 · 2025-10-17
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1555 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 344 of 2024 under Section 3/5ka/8 Cow Slaughter Prevention Act, and Under section 11 The Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Police Station Dalmau, District Raebareli. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not been named in the FIR. The offences alleged are triable by a Magistrate. The applicant has duly explained his criminal history of four cases in the supplementary affidavit. His name has surfaced only in the confessional statement of a co-accused. No recovery has been made from the applicant. The investigation is still in progress, and the applicant undertakes to cooperate with the same. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application; however, he could not refute the fact that no medical examination of the applicant was conducted. On due consideration to the fact that the offences are triable by a Magistrate, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailendra Kumar Mishra, Aiyyaz Mansuri, Krishna Kant Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ikbal @ Iqbal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the applicant is not named in the FIR, no recovery has been made from him, and taking into account his undertaking to cooperate in the investigation, I am of the view that the applicant deserves the protection of anticipatory bail in light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal and others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another, (2020) 5 SCC 1, subject to his continued cooperation in the investigation. In view of the above, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid Case Crime number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/S.H.O. concerned with the following conditions:- The applicant shall report to the investigating officer within twenty days from today. He shall cooperate in the investigation and he will not influence the witness.
The accused-applicant will remain present as and when the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned call(s) for investigation/interrogation. The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. The application is allowed. October 17, 2025 R.C.
NABAIL No. 1555 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench