HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8999 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "WHEREFORE, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the summoning order dated: 03.03.2023 passed by "Court of Special Judge, (SC/ST) Act Lucknow", vide Case Crime No. 268/2022 "State Versus Vipin Kumar Singh and another" under section 279, 504,506,427 I.P.C. and section 3(1)(d),3(1)(e),3(2)va of the SC/ST Act, Police Station-Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow, and further proceedings of the case in pursuance thereof, pending in the "Court of Special Judge, (SC/ST) Act Lucknow", in the ends of justice." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. October 17, 2025 Vinay/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Furkan Pathan, Kamran Anwar, Karan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Vipin Kumar Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench