Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189900 (ALL)

SANJU KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BAL VIKAS SEVA EVAM PUSHTAHAR DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/10991/2025 · 2025-09-22

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10991 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties 1 to 6 and Mr. Vijay Kumar Tripathi, Advocate appearing on behalf of opposite party no.7, whose power filed today is taken on record. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned to appoint petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Worker in the Village concerned since appointment of opposite party no.7, namely Smt. Sandhya Tiwari, wife of Mr. Amit Tiwari, has been cancelled. 3. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 19.09.2025, a copy of which are taken on record and as per which, opposite party no.7 had challenged the order of cancellation of her appointment in Writ - A No. 6643 of 2025 and the same was allowed by means of judgment and order dated 09.05.2025 directing authorities concerned to pass appropriate orders after affording opportunity of hearing to the said person. It is submitted that final orders have not yet been passed and petitioner's claim would be dependent on such orders. 4. Aforesaid facts have not been denied by learned counsel for petitioner who however submits that petitioner was in fact indicated at serial no.1 in the select list but admits that no such select list has been brought on record. 5. In view of such submissions, it is directed that in case cancellation of appointment of opposite party no.7 is upheld, petitioner's case may be considered, if she falls within the zone of eligibility. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Singh, Shubham Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sanju Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Bal Vikas Seva Evam Pushtahar Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 10991 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench