Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 218 of 2025
Subhan
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Siddharth Bisht, A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.204 of 2024, under Sections 8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station- Kotwali Manglaur, District- Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
According to the FIR, on 21.03.2024, 5.35 grams smack was allegedly recovered from the co-accused, who revealed the name of the applicant.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the main accused has already been granted bail; the bail application of the applicant has been rejected merely because there are some cases pending against him; the applicant is not a previous convict.
2
5.
Learned State Counsel would submit that the bail rejection order does not reveal any previous conviction of the applicant.
6.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7.
The bail application is allowed.
8.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
13.02.2025 Ravi Bisht