RAJESH KUMAR PANDEY v. PRADEEP KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER
/6792/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6792 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. The present writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer:-
"I. Issue a order or direction commanding to the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sadar to decide the Regular Suit No. 642 of 2018, Pradeep Kumar Gupta & Other versus Himanchal Prasad and another, with in specific period fixed by this Hon'ble Court, contained as Annexure No. 1 to this petition." On being asked from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether the petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid suit before the trial court, the learned counsel for the petitioner has replied that no such application has been preferred before the court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the case expeditiously. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid suit before the court concerned mentioning therein the urgency in the matter and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner, the same may be decided by the court concerned within the stipulated time fixed by this Court. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for early disposal of aforesaid suit before the Civil Division (Junior Division), Sadar, Faizabad. If any such application is preferred, endeavour shall be made by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sadar, Faizabad, to decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner looking into the urgency mentioned therein expeditiously, in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Rajesh Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Pradeep Kumar Gupta And Another .....Respondent(s)
concerned, in case there is no legal impediment, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. November 24, 2025 Nitesh A227 No. 6792 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench