RAJIYA KHATOON @ RAJIYA BEGAM v. TAJMUL HASAN AND OTHERS
/6799/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189896 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189896 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6799 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Order on application for impleadment
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties on application for impleadment.
2. By means of this application dated 21.11.2025 the applicant/ petitioner has prayed to implead the Hon'ble Member, Shri Sahjab Singh, Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj, in the array of opposite parties.
3. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection in this regard.
4. Application for impleadment is allowed.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to carry out the necessary amendment/ impleadment, as prayed in the application for impleadment, during the course of the day.
Order on memo of writ petition.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.9.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj to decide the Revision No. 3448 of 2022 bearing Computerized Case No. AL20220257003448, " Rajiya Begam Vs. Tajmul Hasan & others", within stipulated time, in the interest of jsutice.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Prakash Singh Vats, Ajay Kumar Soni Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pankaj Gupta Rajiya Khatoon @ Rajiya Begam .....Petitioner(s) Tajmul Hasan And Others .....Respondent(s)
petitioner would be sufficiently met in case Board of Revenue considers and decides the aforesaid revision in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj is directed to make all endeavor to decide Revision No. 3448 of 2022 bearing Computerized Case No. AL20220257003448, " Rajiya Begam Vs. Tajmul Hasan & others",, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 24, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6799 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench