Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189892 (ALL)

RAMHET GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/13545/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13545 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 16.10.2025 whereby petitioner's representation for transfer to Districts Ayodhya or Sultanpur has been rejected. 3. Learned State Counsel at the very outset submits that impugned order has been passed inadvertently considering representation of another person. He therefore seeks liberty in favour of appropriate authority for passing orders on representation of petitioner. 4. Considering aforesaid submissions, opposite party no.2 i.e. Chairman, U.P. Police Establishment Board, Lucknow is directed to reconsider case of petitioner for transfer to Districts Ayodhya or Sultanpur in view of fact that petitioner has less than two years to superannuate. Such a decision shall be taken by authority concerned expeditiously within a period of two weeks from receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. In view thereof, there is no occasion to interfere with order dated 16.10.2025 which however, shall not form a part of decision with regard to petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramchandra Gupta, Shivendra S Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramhet Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 24, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 13545 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench