HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9477 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. Despite service of notice no one is present for the informant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 151 of 2025, under Sections 65(1), 78, 351(2) of B.N.S. & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Sitapur. 3. The F.I.R. in question was lodged for the missing person, alleging that the applicant had enticed the daughter of the informant, aged about 16 years, subsequently, in the statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that she was friendly with the person for the last four years through Instagram, it was also stated that on various occasions, on the threat of making certain in appropriate photo viral certain money were also being demanded. It was also stated that the victim had stopped the meeting the applicant and his friends. With regard to the applicant, allegation of rape making that on four to five occasions, however, on 12.06.2025, the victim had gone along with co-accused Subham Yadav on his bike towards Lucknow. In the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, allegations were levelled against Subham Yadav with regard to forming physical relations, the medical on record does not corroborate the allegations of any force being used, considering that the allegations against the applicant are in the statement under Section 180 and 183 BNSS only with regard to forming physical relations on four to five occasions sometimes on 25.03.2025 and there being no such allegation with regard to the incident occurred on 12.06.2025 against the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dishan @ Zeeshan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the contentions of rival parties coupled with the fact that applicant is languishing in jail since 17.06.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, is enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Dishan @ Zeeshan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 7, 2025 Praveen BAIL No. 9477 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench