RAHUL KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO.
/139/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189879 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189879 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 139 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.292 of 2024, under Sections 316(5) of BNS, Police Station Masauli, District Barabanki.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the co-accused have been enlarged on bail by the court below.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who has been enlarged on bail and the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 15.11.2024 and the applicant has criminal antecedent of one case, which has been duly explained, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Rahul Kumar Yadav be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Misra, Ashok Kumar Yadava, Kuldeep Kumar Tiwari, Paritosh Shukla, Sukh Deo Singh, Suraj Narayan Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Dhirendra Kumar Awasthi, Rajeev Rai Rahul Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 139 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench