Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189876 (ALL)

KANCHANLATA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BARABANKI AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/10151/2025 · 2025-10-17

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10151 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed against an order dated 08.08.2024 passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. 3. In a catena of judgments passed by the Supreme Court as well as this Court, it has been mandated that in financial matters, including those arising under the SARFAESI Act, the Writ Court does not interfere when the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy. In the present case, the remedy of the petitioner lies in filing an application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. 4. In light of the same, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal for redressal of her grievances. October 17, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Desh Deepak Verma, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vinay Shankar (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Kanchanlata .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Barabanki And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench