KAMLESH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.and ORS
WRIA/17011/2017 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 17011 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Sri Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no.3 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. consigned to record. November 24, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Nitesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Manish Mishra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Kamlesh Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench