IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY .THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13212 OF 2025 AMARAVAg Between: D Jyothi, W/o. Venugopal, Aged 54 Chinnapanduru Panchayat, Varadaiahpatem Mandal, Tirupati District. years R/o. Chinnapanduru Village ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer. Sullurpeta, Tirupati District. 4. The Tahsildar, Varadaiahpalem Mandal Tirupati District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents i trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land Ac.0.05 Cents in Sy.No.29/1 of Chinnapand Mandal,Tirupati District, without issuing any notice, without following the as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principies of Natural Justice Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution a writ in in admeasuring an extent of uru Village, Varadaiahpalem due process of law of India, Consequently not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.05 Cents Chinnapanduru Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, lA NO: 1 OF Qnytj direct the respondents herein in Sy.No.29/1 of Tirupati District. Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances m support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Sy.No.29/1 of Chinnapandu an extent of Ac.0.05 Cents in Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal Tirupati District, without following the due process of law. ru Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents; GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER; :SRI. V VINOD K REDDY r'' APHC0102633621325 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) &y:S [3329] FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13212/2025 Between: D Jyothi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.VVINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13212/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.05 Cents in Sy. No. 29/1 of Chinnapanduru Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Tirupati District without issuing any notice, without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.05 Cents in Sy.No.29/1 of Chinnapanduru Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Tirupati District and pass such other order. ” 1 2. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, without \ touching the merits of the case, requested this Court to issue a direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property, without following due process of law. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents would follow due process of law. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents, it is observed that when the petitioner 3 are in settled possession and enjoyment of the subject property, she cannot be dispossessed, without following due process of law in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in “Rame Gowda (dead) by L.Rs. V. M.Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by LRs.^’’. Therefore, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property, except by following due process of law. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Se- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1. The PrincijDal^Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Guntur District.(SPECIAL MESSENGER) 2. The District Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sullurpeta, Tirupati District 4. l^he Tahsildar, Varadaiahpalem Mandal Tirupati District. 5. One CC to SRI. V VINOD K REDDY Advocate [OPUC] GP for REVENUE .High Court Of Andhra 7. Three CD Copies To, Pradesh. psk 2004 (1) see 769 V HIGH COURT DATED: 09/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.13212 of 2025 g tl JUL 2025 m i ^ Current Section DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITH NO COSTS