Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189859 (ALL)

JATINDRA @ TEIMPO @ JITENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 3 OTHERS

/434/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 434 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicant informed that the trial of the case in question has already been concluded, therefore, the present application has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed as having become infructuous. November 24, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Kumar, Krishan Bhushan Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Jatindra @ Teimpo @ Jitendra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench