Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18985 (GAU)

AMIR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS

WP(C)/5311/2023 · 2025-06-15

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010232772023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C)/5311/2023 AMIR HUSSAIN S/O LATE KURMAN ALI R/O VILL- SRIPUR PART-I P.O.-FULBARI P.S.-KATIGORAH DIST- CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE MISSION DIRECTOR JAL JEEVAN MISSION ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/3 CACHAR SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM 5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CACHAR ZILLA PARISHAD SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPT. SILCHAR DIVISION-1 SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM 7:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CACHAR NOW RE-DESIGNATED AS THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM 8:MANSUR ALOM MAZUMDAR S/O MOYJUL HOQUE MAZUMDAR R/O VILL- SRIPUR PART-II UNDER FULBARI GAON PANCHAYAT P.S.-KATIGORAH P.O.-GONIRGRAM PT-II DIST-CACHAR ASSAM ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM 9:THE FULBARI GAON PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT P.O.-FULBARI DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 10:WATER USERS COMMITTEE Page No.# 3/3 SIRISHPUR WATER SUPPLY SCHEME REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT VILL-SRIPUR PART-I P.O.-FULBARI PIN-788802 DIST-CACHAR ASSAM 11:ABDUL HANNAN CHOUDHURY S/O LATE SIKENDAR ALI CHOUDHURY R/O VILL SRIPUR PART-I P.O.-FULBARI P.S.-KATIGORAH DIST-CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788802 ------------ Advocate for : MR. R MAJUMDAR Advocate for : SC P H E appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 16.06.2025 Ms. U. Nanda, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Shri R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. Also heard Shri Gogoi, the learned Standing Counsel, PHE Department and Shri M.H. Laskar, learned counsel for the respondent no.8. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant