Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18985 (CHH)

BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/470/2025 · 2025-05-08

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:21584 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 470 of 2025 1 - Bahadur Singh S/o. Lt. Kunj Ram Aged About 59 Years R/o. Ward - 6, Gram - Umda, Charoda, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 2 - Neelkanth Baghel S/o. Shri Baghela Aged About 52 Years R/o. Shastri Nagar, Balaknath, Khursipar, Bhilai, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 3 - Chova Ram S/o. Bhukhanlal Aged About 51 Years R/o. Ward - 6, Gram- Umda, Bhilai-3, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 4 - Rajendra Netam S/o. Jagannath Aged About 50 Years R/o. Ward - 70, Hudco, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 5 - Chendas Tandon S/o. Beniram Aged About 60 Years R/o. Ward - 14, IHSDP, Bhilai, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 6 - Mahesh Shukla S/o. Ramnarayan Shukla Aged About 47 Years R/o. Ganesh Nagar, Jamul, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 7 - Vinod Khobragade S/o. Munna Lal Aged About 58 Years R/o. Kosanagar, Bhilai, Dist. Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Urban Administration Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.05.12 11:13:17 +0530 2 / 2 2 - Deputy Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Dist. Durg (C.G.) 3 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Dist. Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. Sanjeev Pandey, Dy. Advocate General For Respondents/Corporation : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 09/05/2025 1. This MCC has been filed for restoration of WPS No.891/2025, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above matter was listed on 08/04/2025 but due to some bonafide mistake, he could not appear before this Court and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. On due consideration, the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner and the pleadings made in the MCC, it is allowed. WPS No.891/2025 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.7,000/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar