LAKSHIMAN @ LAKSHMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/6469/2025 · 2025-11-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189833 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189833 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6469 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.7 of 2025, under Sections 105 of BNS, P.S. Maakhi, District- Unnao. 3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the husband of informant was hit by three persons and subsequently, he was taken to the hospital where he died. Post-mortem report indicates the cause of death as ante mortem injuries. In the light of the said, learned counsel for the applicant has drawn the attention of this Court on the statement of witness, who stated that on account of some fight, deceased was pushed and thereafter, beaten up, which resulted in his death. In the statement of the applicant, he also admitted that on account of abuses being heard, he had beaten up the victim which resulted in his death. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that on account of a dispute being arose between the parties, the alleged incident had taken place coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 15.01.2025, having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Lakshiman @ Lakshman be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jayveer Rajput Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lakshiman @ Lakshman .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 18, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 6469 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench